Now I ask this for a few reasons. Most people do not like this, one:because it can be a bit broken, and two: because if you do not do it with a group of friends but with strangers, you lose by default at times.
Personally at first I loved 3v3 and 4v4. I think that when I was really bad (I am prob still sort of bad, though NapE and whoever else did 3v3s with me can judge) other players could compensate for my poor game, esp early game, leaving me to mass something like vrays or whatever and go for gg. Or they just distract the opponent long enough for me to build an economy, an army, and help out.
But then lately, that is particularly today, I hated 3v3 and 4v4. Only just making NA, I went to do the quali matches, and only won 3 of 5 for 3v3. The upsetting thing is when you look at replays, and see that your apm is higher than that of your team mates combined, and your income is double, and that you pretty much lost by default. In the other game, it was worse, with it being virtually 1v3 as my team mates just massed marines and zealots in their base for 15 minutes while I expanded twice, went mass stalker ball, pushed two opponents back and then got overrun by mass hydra and 20 or so vrays. And my team did....nothing?
So it is upsetting, that my enjoyment of such formats had to nosedive. Though there are some wonderful 3v3 and 4v4 maps.
I think I just wanted to rant a little bit. Give me your thoughts or post your stories (good or bad) ^_^